Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id IAA03906 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:52:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzuxy11810; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:43:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA02572; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:43:06 -0500
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:43:06 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <30d6d2bc.4863507@mail.ican.ca>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: poirierg@ican.ca (Gerald Poirier)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Digital Video....
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
On Tue, 19 Dec 1995 06:47:31 -0500, you wrote:
>
>With all this talk of video equipment, I thought this might be a good
>time to ask if anyone knows what is happening with the rumored Digital
>Video Tape format?
>
David, they talk about it a lot in rec.video.desktop and
rec.video.production
The new cameras are not as interesting as the new FORMAT is.
They're more interesting in nice lighting situations, and there is no
manual focus, among other observations. And not yet a board that will